UM Law LogoHome | Directory | Search | Site Map | Thurgood Marshall Law Library 
Prospective StudentsCurrent StudentsFaculty & StaffAlumni & FriendsPublic

Environmental Regulation Casebook

Image of Casebook

Environmental Law Casebook Information

Home

Authors

New Sample Syllabus

Photo Tour

Supreme Court Predictions

Cases to Watch

Meet the Agencies

News You Can Use

Printing Problems?

Comments/Questions

Environmental Law Program

Chapter 4: Waste Management and Pollution Prevention

Contribution Claims Under §107 and §113 of CERCLA: The Atlantic Research Decision (pp. 416-22)

As discussed on p. 417 of the casebook, in 2004 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Cooper Industries v. Aviall Services, Inc., 543 U.S. 157 (2004), that a private party who had not been subjected to an enforcement or cost recovery action under §106 or 107 of CERCLA may not obtain contribution for cleanup costs under §113(f)(1).  While this decision was widely criticized for discouraging voluntary cleanup of releases of hazardous substance, the Court expressly reserved the question whether such a party could obtain contribution under §107 of CERCLA.  Three years later in United States v. Atlantic Research Corp., 127 S.Ct. 2331 (2007), the Court unanimously ruled that §107does provide potentially responsible parties with a right of action for contribution.  An edited copy of this decision appears in the 2008-2009 edition of our Statutory and Case Supplement on pp. 1047-1050.

© 2007 University of Maryland, School of Law.  All Rights Reserved

500 W. Baltimore Street UMB Seal Baltimore, MD 21201-1786